Context-First Architecture: Designing Token-Efficient LLM Systems for Scalable Intelligence

Blogs » Context-First Architecture: Designing Token-Efficient LLM Systems for Scalable Intelligence

The adoption of large language models (LLMs) in enterprise has changed the way businesses interact with their data. From natural language querying to complex automation, these models make interactions feel simple.

Initially, much of the value proposition centered around simplicity—query anything, get a response.

However, behind that simplicity lies a growing challenge: cost. LLMs charge based on how much data you send them and how much they generate in return. So, while the upfront licensing may seem reasonable, token-based billing introduces complexity and is emerging as a limiting factor. While licensing fees may appear manageable at first, the real cost arises in continuous, high-volume use—especially when large volumes of unprocessed or minimally filtered data are passed directly to LLMs.

Here’s the catch: these models are powerful, but they’re not meant to do all the heavy lifting. Instead of treating the LLM as the brain that processes everything, pair it with specialized systems that perform specific tasks—just as the brain coordinates various parts of the body. We need a shift in approach: LLMs should not be the engine for raw data processing but the final step in contextualizing and linking answers intelligently. By building context-first architectures that retrieve and compress only the most relevant data for each query, enterprises can drastically reduce token usage, latency, and operational cost—without sacrificing accuracy or flexibility.

The Cost Dynamics of LLMs
LLMs like GPT-4, Claude, or Gemini charge based on token consumption. Each token is a chunk of text—roughly a word. Charges apply both to tokens passed into the model (inputs) and those generated by it (responses). If your enterprise routinely sends 5,000-word blocks of unfiltered data (e.g., entire PDF contracts, full database exports, large Excel sheets), you’re consuming vast token volumes unnecessarily.

The problem is compounded in use cases where data is repetitive or loosely related to the user’s intent. For example, consider a customer support assistant built on chat history and knowledge base documents. Without filtering or preprocessing, it must “read” thousands of tokens just to pick out relevant information for a relatively simple question. This over-reliance on brute-force language modeling is neither scalable nor sustainable. Instead, we must design systems that pass only what is necessary—in the right form, at the right time.

The Case for Contextualization-First Design
A contextualization-first approach views the LLM as the final step in a pipeline—not the pipeline itself. It focuses on extracting just enough information from various data sources and using the LLM to reason over this curated context.

The best implementation model here is a retriever-generator architecture:

  • Retriever: Filters, ranks, sequences, or summarizes data from the broader dataset.
  • Generator (LLM): Consumes the retrieved context and generates a final answer.

Contextualization by Data Type

  • Structured Data (e.g., databases, Excel):
    – Use fuzzy matching or schema discovery to translate natural language into structured queries (e.g., SQL).
    – Retrieve and normalize only rows or summaries relevant to the user’s question.
    – Use the LLM to interpret results or perform reasoning on aggregated data.
  • Unstructured Data (e.g., PDFs, chat logs):
    – Convert documents to embeddings (e.g., via OpenAI, Cohere, or Sentence Transformers).
    – Use vector similarity to retrieve the top N relevant chunks.
    – Optionally summarize before sending to the LLM.
  • Mixed Data (e.g., CRM + documents):
    – First filter based on structured data attributes (e.g., find all tickets from “North America, last 90 days”).
    – Then perform vector or keyword search on associated notes or comments.

Design Principles for a Context-Efficient Architecture

  • Preprocessing Pipelines
    Pre-tag all incoming data—whether structured or unstructured—with searchable metadata. Use regular expressions, NLP, or domain rules to create indexable units.
  • Retriever Layers
    Implement modular retrievers:
    – Rule-based: Exact match, filters, joins.
    – Vector-based: Embedding similarity.
    – Hybrid: Use rules to narrow the candidate pool, then apply vector search.
  • Controlled Prompting
    Define max token limits for LLM input. Design prompt templates with:
    – Placeholder markers (e.g., {relevant_section}).
    – Fallback behavior if context is too sparse.
  • Compression & Summarization
    Use smaller models or fast summarizers (e.g., DistilBART, extractive LLMs) to condense long text before passing it to a GPT-style LLM.
  • Memory & Caching
    – Store frequent query patterns and their resolved contexts.
    – Cache context paths for repeated or similar intents.
  • Domain-Specific Knowledge Graphs
    Build vocabularies and taxonomies for your domain. Use them to guide search, rank documents, and prune irrelevant data.
  • Security and Privacy
    – Mask or redact sensitive information before sending data to LLMs.
    – Implement role-based access to retrieved content.
    – Maintain audit trails of query and response logs.
  • Evaluation and Feedback Loops
    – Collect human and automated feedback on LLM responses.
    – Track metrics such as accuracy, latency, and cost per query.
    – Periodically retrain or refine retriever and summarizer models.
  • Observability & Monitoring
    – Track token usage by endpoint, query type, or user.
    – Set up alerts for unusual usage patterns.
    – Monitor retriever and model response latencies.
  • Personalization & Adaptation
    – Adapt retrieval based on user history or preferences.
    – Use user-level embeddings to tune context relevance.
  • Fallback Logic & Human Override
    – Provide confidence scores with responses.
    – Enable fallback to manual search or human review when confidence is low.
  • Versioning and Experimentation
    – A/B test retriever models, summarizers, and prompts.
    – Maintain version control for all prompt templates and LLM flows

Business Impact & Future Outlook
This design delivers:

  • Cost Efficiency: Lower token usage = reduced bills.
  • Latency Reduction: Less data = faster responses.
  • Scalability: Can handle hundreds of concurrent queries intelligently.
  • Generalizability: Works across domains—finance, telecom, healthcare—by abstracting retrieval logic.
In the future, these architectures may become middleware standards. Think of them as a “smart context layer” sitting between enterprise data and foundation models—one that guarantees accuracy, controls spend, and enables governance.

The real power of LLMs lies not in how much data they can absorb, but in how precisely we can prepare what they should absorb. A contextualization-first architecture ensures that LLMs act as intelligent interpreters of already-relevant data, rather than as expensive scavengers of raw information. For any enterprise looking to move from experimentation to scalable deployment, this shift is not optional—it’s essential.

Lirik empowers businesses to seize global opportunities with top-tier CRM, ERP, and data solutions. We combine startup agility with enterprise maturity, delivering personalized experiences, operational excellence and transformative growth.

Talk to one of our experts.

If you are applying or looking for a job, please email hiring@lirik.io.

Global Delivery Centers

Gurgaon

Fortune Towers II, Floor #5 406 Udyog Vihar, Phase III Gurgaon, India, 122016

Noida

Akasa Coworking,
3rd Floor, C-27 Phase 2 Industrial Area, Sector 62 Noida, India, 201309

Pune

Suma Center, 6th Floor Near Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital Pune, India, 411004

Jaipur

IndiQube Fort, 3rd Floor Malviya Nagar, Jaipur India, 302017

Nagpur

4th Floor, JK Heights
Ajni Square, Deo Nagar Nagpur, India, 440015
Copyright 2025 Lirik All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2024 Lirik All Rights Reserved.